Situational Judgement

Can You Really Prepare for an SJT? (And Is It Worth Paying?)

Learn independent SJT action ratings from authority, evidence and consequences. Worked reasoning, practice limits and how to query an answer.

You can practise reading a workplace scenario carefully, recognising the authority it gives you and explaining the consequences of each action. Preparation can make the format more familiar. It cannot guarantee an official mark, and buying a pack is not necessary just to try the approach.

Rate the action described

For the HEO 2026 response format, judge each action independently on the six-point scale. You may use the same rating several times. Do not force five actions into five different positions or assume that every scenario must include a middle rating.

Use three checks:

  1. Authority: are you permitted to make this decision, or does the scenario reserve it for someone else?
  2. Evidence: what do you know, what remains uncertain and what would the action actually establish?
  3. Consequence: does it protect service delivery, accuracy and fair treatment, or knowingly create a risk or bypass a control?

Then consider how completely the action addresses the stated problem. A useful partial response can be appropriate without being the strongest response. Serious control failures should not be treated as harmless compromises merely because nothing has gone wrong yet.

Free practice · no card

Try original Irish-format practice before your test.

Six-point SJT ratings, numerical and verbal practice, with PSP scoring explained. Check your competition booklet for the official format and timing.

Start the free taster No sign-up wall. Nothing to cancel.

Worked reasoning: two useful actions can share a rating

Original PSP example: You supervise a team processing applications. A required attachment is often missing because the guidance is unclear. You can clarify approved guidance and arrange staff cover, but cannot change the scheme’s evidence requirements.

Checking a revised document checklist with the scheme owner is useful. Arranging a short staff briefing on the same requirements is also useful. Both can be appropriate: neither needs a worse rating just to distinguish them. Neither action alone proves that the problem has been solved; monitoring subsequent incomplete applications would add evidence.

Removing the attachment requirement locally is a different decision. It exceeds the authority stated in the scenario and bypasses a control. Sending every routine query to your manager without a proposal is also different from escalating an immediate risk that is outside your authority. Judge the actual facts, not a slogan about always escalating or never escalating.

This is an original learning illustration, not an official question or answer key. See the current practice corrections and scoring explanation.

Use explanations to learn, rather than memorising a number

After submitting a coached response, compare your rating with the suggested one. Identify the fact that explains the difference. If you cannot justify it, query it using the link beside the feedback; the form includes the PSP reference and lets you explain your concern.

PSP corrected ratings, wording and explanations on 15 and 16 October after candidates raised valid concerns. Our reviews were AI editorial reviews with primary-source factual checks, not official or human expert approval. Earlier saved results retain their original content and scores. A suggested PSP rating remains an independent learning judgement.

Try free material before paying

Start with the free HEO rating example or free general SJT taster. Check whether you understand both the response format and the reasoning in the feedback. Choose paid practice only if the additional original scenarios and saved work are useful to you.

New sessions share question history across practice modes. Review an old question to revise its reasoning, but use fresh material to judge whether you can apply the method elsewhere. A practice percentage does not predict a pass or order of merit.

Match the current booklet

The supplied HEO 2026 booklet describes 10 scenarios, 50 independently rated actions and a standard 50-minute limit. Repeated ratings are allowed. Correct and near-correct responses receive credit, but the official weights are not disclosed. PSP’s exact-and-adjacent practice points are explained separately.

EO, AP and specialist competitions can have different instructions. Use your own booklet and the official Capability Framework. For HEO logistics, use the test-day checklist.